New study exposes falsehood of Republican claim that unemployment aid keeps people from working

-

- Advertisment -

“From the perspective of the first week of June 2020, with 8 weeks of supplementary UI payment remaining and as states were moving to re-open their economies, only workers in the lowest paid occupation (food services, with typical earnings of $460 per week) would be about indifferent between accepting an offer and remaining unemployed,” according to a working paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. “The value of a job, especially in a depressed labor market, significantly outweighs the value of the temporary additional UI income.”

The additional $600 a week passed by Congress in the early months of the pandemic would have a “moderate effect” on whether people took jobs, the authors estimated, but $300 a week has just a “small effect.” Small as in if you have 28 people and seven of them get job offers, one would turn it down because they were getting that extra $300 a week.

This is not the first study to find that the Republican claims about too-generous unemployment benefits keeping people from the workforce are false. One by Yale economists found that at the $600 level, there was “no evidence that high UI [unemployment insurance] replacement rates drove job losses or slowed rehiring,” and one by a University of Massachusetts economist focused on workers without a college degree, which did “not provide evidence supporting the claim that the [Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation] has held back the labor market recovery.” Additionally, since Census Bureau data finds one in three people on unemployment saying that they are still having trouble paying for basic necessities, the whole “people are so comfortable getting unemployment checks that they have no incentive to work” message is way off base.

Republicans aren’t letting any of that get in their way—not the dropping levels of new unemployment claims, not the gap that still exists between the number of jobs now and the number of jobs before the pandemic, not the studies showing that $300 a week is not keeping people out of the job market. Creating a desperate labor force for employers to push into low-wage, no-benefit jobs is a Republican wet dream, and they’re hoping to take it to completion. Millions of jobless workers will pay the price.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. AllStocksNews.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Owen Mayhttps://allstocksnews.com
Owen May is the editor-in-chief of AllStocksNews. He has a master's in economics and you will find him covering various topics.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Latest News

‘As Long as the Party Embraces Trump, It’s Going to Have Trouble’

In 1998, when Dave Woodward was elected to the state House at age 22, one of the things that...

KUWTK: Kylie Jenner Recalls A Guy Made Her Feel ‘Unkissable’ Before Getting Lip Fillers!

Despite the fact that many people look up to celebrities and usually consider them the standard for beauty...

Flare Finance Announces Partnership with XinFin Network

Flare Finance has announced a partnership with XinFin Network which could be one of the most significant events of...

How to Run a QuickBooks Sales Tax Report

Sales tax management is a no-profit activity for your business. It’s not fun, but it is necessary. Setting up...

What Is Wrong With the Texas Grid? Our electric system can’t deliver the power we need when we need it most. But political leaders...

majority of constituentsI work in local and state politics. The majority of Texas voters are Republican-leaning, however the majority...
- Advertisment -